Date: 2006-06-30 05:07 am (UTC)
shirenomad: (politics)
From: [personal profile] shirenomad
However, this is a weak argument as it is impossible to tie consequence to action - in the end, there's no way to justifiably say that 'X happened because of Y'.

The article itself admits that several enemy leaders have been caught unaware by the program, and their resources-in-transit seized. No, we don't know what they would have done had they not been caught, but I think it's fair to say things would be nastier for our side. From there it follows that we're going to miss out on some choice captures and fail to intercept large wads of cash being used in terrorist activity. (Intelligence is actually in the process of determining a damage assessment from the revelation of the program.)

The term is almost always applied to information regarding EVENTS (which is to say, occurances or operations that occur over a relatively brief timespan) and NOT to long-running programs because such programs have an increased weight in regards to the public interest and therefore it is more difficult to justify their continued classification.

During WWII, we broke the German's codes early and used that information in the ULTRA program to predict several of their submarine movements. ULTRA continued for the duration of the war and wasn't declassified until the 70s. Had a newspaper revealed the existence of the program, the Germans would have switched codes and their sub fleet would have been deadly again.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

shirenomad: (Default)
shirenomad

April 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 08:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios